I dont mind a good bit of information from Wiki, it was interesting to know about all the false information and discussion that goes on.
These two website explain some really interesting info about Wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About#Strengths.2C_weaknesses.2C_and_article_quality_in_Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Why_Wikipedia_is_not_so_greatikipedia:Why_Wikipedia_is_not_so_great
I watched a movie recently and thought it would be interesting to research on Wikipedia. The Beach, 2000The article was very accurate with its information after looking up information on google about the plot, characters and themes i found that Wiki had them covered. Wiki cover the plot, cast, difference between the Film and Novel, controversy, soundtrack and themes. The information that wiki presented for the article easily covered the basic information needed for a research project on the film. Yes this article does cover the wikipedia quidelines for useful articles. This article doesnt really have an arguement, its more of a documentary of the events of the movie.
Rachel BilsonI choose to look up one of my favourite celebrities for my next check up on Wikipedia. Wiki gave a very descriptive annalysis of the actor, from her career to personel life. This article doesnt follow the wikipedia normal facts of understanding, but is simple to follow and the information is correct according to yahoo and google. the article is a positive arguement for the actor and demonstrates all her good traits and qualities.
For both articles i would go into description more, for example height, hair colour, body type and so on..
No comments:
Post a Comment